![]() But beneath those tensions, diplomatic avenues are being feverishly explored and the outlines of potential solutions, still amorphous, may be taking form. Moscow has readied still more forces on the Ukraine border. The United States has snapped NATO to attention and moved forces east. “If I were making a motto for Committee,” he said, “it would be ‘The Yanks Are Not Coming.PARIS - The standoff with Russia over Ukraine enters a critical phase this week. William Allen White, Chairman of an interventionist organization called the Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies, reassured his listeners that the point of helping Britain was to keep the United States out of the war. Some interventionists believed US military action was inevitable, but many others believed the United States could still avoid sending troops to fight on foreign soil, if only the Neutrality Acts could be relaxed to allow the federal government to send military equipment and supplies to Great Britain. It would be, as President Franklin Delano Roosevelt put it, like “living at the point of a gun,” and the buffer provided by the Pacific and Atlantic would be useless. If no European power remained as a check against Nazi Germany, the United States could become isolated in a world where the seas and a significant amount of territory and resources were controlled by a single powerful dictator. The democracies of Western Europe, they argued, were a critical line of defense against Hitler’s fast-growing strength. Interventionists believed the United States did have good reasons to get involved in World War II, particularly in Europe. However, he argued, American soldiers ought not to have to “fight everybody in the world who prefers some other system of life to ours.” Speaking in 1941 of an “independent American destiny,” Lindbergh asserted that the United States ought to fight any nation that attempted to meddle in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere. Aviator Charles Lindbergh and popular radio priest Father Charles Coughlin were the Committee’s most powerful spokesmen. Isolationist organizations like the America First Committee sought to influence public opinion through print, radio, and mass rallies. Neutrality, combined with the power of the US military and the protection of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, would keep Americans safe while the Europeans sorted out their own problems. ![]() The best policy, they claimed, was for the United States to build up its own defenses and avoid antagonizing either side. Isolationists believed that World War II was ultimately a dispute between foreign nations and that the United States had no good reason to get involved. The urgency of the situation intensified the debate in the United States over whether American interests were better served by staying out or getting involved. Great Britain was the only major European power left standing against Hitler’s war machine. Nazi Germany had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia and had conquered Poland, Belgium, the Netherlands, and France. Congress passed a series of Neutrality Acts in the late 1930s, aiming to prevent future involvement in foreign wars by banning American citizens from trading with nations at war, loaning them money, or traveling on their ships.īut by 1940, the deteriorating global situation was impossible to ignore. Most Americans still believed the nation’s interests were best served by staying out of foreign conflicts and focusing on problems at home, especially the devastating effects of the Great Depression. Neither the rise of Adolf Hitler to power nor the escalation of Japanese expansionism did much to change the nation’s isolationist mood in the 1930s. Many Americans were disillusioned by how little their efforts had accomplished and felt that getting so deeply involved on the global stage in 1917 had been a mistake. Hundreds of thousands of Americans were either killed or wounded during that conflict, and President Woodrow Wilson’s idealistic plan to ensure permanent peace through international cooperation and American leadership failed to become a reality. The US ambivalence about the war grew out of the isolationist sentiment that had long been a part of the American political landscape and had pervaded the nation since World War I. Even as the war consumed large portions of Europe and Asia in the late 1930s and early 1940s, there was no clear consensus on how the United States should respond. Before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, however, Americans were seriously divided over what the role of the United States in the war should be, or if it should even have a role at all. ![]() Top Image Courtesy of the Associated Pressįrom our 21st-century point of view, it is hard to imagine World War II without the United States as a major participant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |